Categories: World News

US lawmakers threaten Pam Bondi with contempt action over unreleased Epstein material


US lawmakers demand full release of Epstein files, threatening legal action over withheld DOJ documents. Bipartisan pressure increases on DOJ.

Epstein files, Department of Justice, US Congress, Pam Bondi, legal action, government transparency, bipartisan effort, sex offender, document release





US Lawmakers Threaten Legal Action Over Withheld Epstein Files

US Lawmakers Threaten Legal Action Over Withheld Epstein Files

Watch: Images, cassettes and high-profile figures – What’s in the latest Epstein files?

Background: The Demand for Transparency

A heated battle over the release of the Epstein files has escalated, as US lawmakers threaten legal measures against Attorney General Pam Bondi. Despite a legislative mandate requiring the full disclosure of files related to the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, only partial documentation was made public by the Department of Justice (DoJ), prompting bipartisan outrage.

Bipartisan Response and Legal Threats

Massie and Khanna Lead the Charge

Republican Congressman Thomas Massie is spearheading potential contempt proceedings against Bondi, stating that the DoJ is “flouting the spirit and the letter of the law.” This sentiment is echoed by Democratic Congressman Ro Khanna, who claims that a bipartisan coalition is forming to pressure for complete transparency. The proposed legal strategy includes leveraging inherent contempt, a little-used congressional power not invoked in nearly a century (American Bar Association).

According to Khanna, they plan to “fine Pam Bondi for every day that she’s not releasing these documents.” A significant point is that this action could move forward with support solely from the House of Representatives, rather than requiring a full impeachment process.

Senate Action and Schumer’s Resolution

Meanwhile, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer is preparing a resolution to hold the DoJ accountable. Highlighting the bipartisan origins of the law compelling the release, Schumer is seeking Republican support as the Senate considers further action when reconvened in January.

Partial Document Release and Public Backlash

The court-mandated release, signed into law by President Donald Trump after mounting political pressure, was due by last Friday. However, the DoJ’s release featured significant redactions, and numerous documents remain withheld, frustrating lawmakers and survivors of Epstein’s abuse.

Survivors, activists, and legislators argue that the delay and withholding thwart the quest for justice and full public accountability. Despite this, the DoJ maintains that more materials will be released in the coming weeks.

Justice Department’s Response

Pam Bondi and Deputies Defend Their Position

Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche asserted that the department is complying with statutory requirements, despite the overwhelming volume—approximately one million pages—of sensitive documentation. He explained that many of these contain information regarding victims, necessitating careful review ahead of public disclosure.

Addressing the threats from Congress on NBC News’ Meet the Press, Blanche responded defiantly: “Not even a little bit. Bring it on. We are doing everything we’re supposed to be doing to comply with the statute.”

Blanche further revealed that certain files initially published were removed from the DoJ website after concerns from victims were raised, though some, including an image featuring Donald Trump, were later reinstated following a review.

Alternative Options on the Table

Senator Tim Kaine suggested that contempt or impeachment would be “premature,” advocating instead for legislative mechanisms such as appropriations bills to enforce compliance.

Why Do the Epstein Files Matter?

The Epstein files are a vast archive amassed during the Department of Justice’s multiple criminal investigations into Jeffrey Epstein. They are believed to contain critical evidence, correspondence, and revelations about high-profile figures, victims, and the network surrounding Epstein’s crimes.

The ongoing drive for transparency reflects broader demands for justice, government accountability, and public scrutiny in high-profile criminal investigations.

Further Information

References


samuca272

Recent Posts

Thousands without power in freezing Ukraine as renewed Russian strikes continue

Ukraine's leader says regions including Kyiv and Kharkiv are among those suffering the most from…

60 minutos ago

Son of Norway’s crown princess holds back tears giving evidence at rape trial

After a lengthy police investigation, he was charged a large number of offences, ranging from…

2 horas ago

Bill and Hillary Clinton agree to testify in House Epstein investigation

Former US President Bill Clinton and his wife Hillary Clinton, the former Secretary of State,…

3 horas ago

Fourteen migrants dead after collision with Greek coastguard boat

The coastguard said a pursuit was under way at the time of the collision, near…

17 horas ago

Trump says Republicans 'should take over the voting' and 'nationalise' US elections

American elections are primarily run by state law, and voting is administered by local officials…

18 horas ago

Spain announces plans to ban social media for under-16s

Under the changes, social media platforms would be required to have effective age verification systems,…

19 horas ago